Soft skills now tip the hiring scale. A landmark 1918 Carnegie Foundation study found that 85 percent of job success comes from interpersonal ability, not technical know-how. On March 12, 2024, a HireVue survey of 1,158 U.S. employers reported that 65 percent already use skills assessments to predict performance before making an offer. Below, you’ll see how we chose five communication-skills tests that turn gut feeling into data—and when to deploy each one.
We looked for communication-skills assessments that add real decision power, not just a compliance check.
Because needs are split between team development and individual screening, we group one team-level assessment in Segment A and four individual-level tools in Segment B. That way, you can jump straight to the option that matches your current challenge without wading through a forced 1-to-5 ranking.
Every pick meets high bars for depth, availability, validation, fairness, and value. Let’s look at them one by one.
These five criteria ensure each communication skills assessment tool adds real, defensible decision power
TeamDynamics is a team-level personality test that maps how a group Communicates, Processes, Decides, and Executes—four dimensions that combine into 16 repeatable team types (see the TeamDynamics assessment details). Each teammate completes a short online survey, with most finishing in 10–15 minutes. The platform then sends a PDF report that highlights collective strengths, friction points, and members who may feel out of sync.
TeamDynamics Team Communication Assessment Dashboard Screenshot
Because feedback lives at the team, not individual, level, discussions stay forward-looking. Managers use the insights to refine meeting formats, adjust communication norms, and screen new hires for style fit. Pricing is a transparent, one-time per-user fee, so project squads and enterprise departments alike can run the assessment without adding another subscription.
When collaboration stalls for reasons no one can identify, TeamDynamics turns unspoken habits into data the group can address at its next retrospective.
The next four tools focus on a single candidate or employee. Each one measures real-world communication, sometimes alongside cognitive or job-specific skills, so you can compare applicants on data, not instinct.
As of December 2025, eSkill offers more than 600 subjects and 70,000 questions, letting you mix and match content into a role-specific test. Hiring teams use the platform to verify grammar, spelling, reading comprehension, typing speed, and data-entry accuracy in one sitting.
eSkill Communication Skills Test Results Dashboard Screenshot
What sets eSkill apart is its reporting depth. Results arrive in real time and break down every micro-skill, so managers can see whether a candidate missed punctuation rules or struggled with reading speed—detail that doubles as a post-hire coaching plan.
Security matters, especially in regulated industries. The company adds ID checks, tab-switch detection, and optional live video proctoring to deter cheating and support EEOC compliance.
According to eSkill, clients completed more than one million assessments in 2025. Pricing stays usage-based. Small teams can buy a starter pack of tests, while enterprises negotiate volume licenses that connect to 30-plus ATS integrations.
In short, eSkill turns written-communication quality into hard numbers you can defend and develop.
HiPeople lowers the cost of evidence-based soft-skill screening. A free plan lets small teams launch an AI-scored Communication Skills Assessment that presents scenario prompts, where candidates record a short intro, role-play a client update, or explain how they would share bad news. The platform compares each response with data from more than 2,000 client teams and flags strengths such as clarity or warmth, plus watch-outs like defensive language.
HiPeople AI Communication Skills Assessment Dashboard Screenshot
Results appear in a color-coded dashboard that connects to over 20 applicant-tracking systems, so recruiters see a communication score beside coding tests or reference checks. Fairness is transparent: HiPeople publishes ongoing bias-mitigation research and aligns its validation work with EEOC and ISO 10667 guidelines.
Paid plans start at about $20 per month and add custom questions, video responses, and deeper analytics. Many early-stage hiring needs, however, are covered by the free tier. For fast, bias-checked insight into how a candidate will sound on Monday’s client call, HiPeople provides an accessible first step.
iMocha tackles global hiring with AI-EnglishPro, a CEFR-aligned assessment that measures speaking, writing, reading, and listening in about 30 minutes. The test covers 12 questions and auto-scores pronunciation, grammar, and coherence, returning results seconds after submission—a pace that keeps high-demand candidates engaged.
iMocha AI-EnglishPro CEFR-Aligned Communication Assessment Screenshot
Beyond English, the platform offers assessments in more than 50 languages and business-communication modules that rate email etiquette, tone, and persuasion skills. Recruiters can add a one-way video interview; iMocha’s AI flags filler words and hesitation so hiring managers spot confidence gaps quickly.
As of December 2025, iMocha serves over 300 customers, including 15 Fortune 500 companies, and maintains a library of 10,000 ready-to-use assessments. Scores move directly into major LMS and ATS platforms, and white-label options keep branding consistent for candidates.
For teams hiring across time zones and product lines, iMocha offers a multilingual lens that reveals who can communicate clearly, quickly, and in the right language.
When you screen hundreds of applicants, instincts are not enough. TestGorilla lets recruiters insert a Communication Skills test into a broader assessment battery and auto-score every response within minutes.
TestGorilla Communication Skills Test Results and Percentile Rankings Screenshot
The test covers four essentials: reading accuracy, active listening, summarization, and professional etiquette. Scenario items include interpreting email tone, extracting a main idea from an audio clip, and selecting the most respectful reply to feedback. Each candidate receives a percentile score, so hiring managers see who clears the bar at a glance.
Speed and security are built in. Recruiters send invites from the ATS, webcam proctoring deters cheating, and results appear in color-coded dashboards benchmarked against thousands of prior test-takers. The same dashboard supports more than 350 other skills tests as of December 2025, letting you pair the communication module with customer-service scenarios or role-specific coding challenges.
Pricing follows a credit model. The Core plan starts at $142 per month (billed annually) for 400 credits, enough to assess about 130 candidates a year. Compared with the cost of a single bad hire, the math often favors TestGorilla.
If you juggle dozens of open requisitions and need objective data on client-facing communication, TestGorilla converts subjective chatter into sortable, shareable numbers.
Looking for a quick read? The grid below puts the five assessments side by side so you can spot fit and budget fast.
| Tool | Best use case | Modalities measured | Key fairness controls | Typical pricing* |
| TeamDynamics | Team cohesion, meeting hygiene | Survey insight into written, verbal, and non-verbal norms (team level) | Low risk; results reported only at group level | One-time fee per teammate |
| eSkill | Written clarity and speed in regulated roles | Grammar, spelling, reading comprehension, timed writing | Large item banks; disability accommodations | Quote-based, pay per test |
| HiPeople | Early-funnel soft-skill screen on a budget | Audio, video, and text scenarios | Published bias audits; identical prompts | Free tier; paid plans from $20/mo |
| iMocha | Multilingual hiring and enterprise upskilling | Speaking, writing, listening, reading in 50+ languages | Transparent NLP scoring; custom audits | Custom license; enterprise contracts |
| TestGorilla | High-volume hiring with mixed batteries | Reading, listening, summarization, etiquette | Webcam proctoring; large benchmark pool | Core plan ≈ $142/mo (annual billing) |
*Pricing reflects vendor sites as of December 2025.
Work backward from the moment miscommunication costs you time or money, then match that moment to the tool built to fix it.
Match your biggest communication challenges to the assessment tool built to solve them, then confirm style, modalities, and fairness
Quick double-check:
Follow these three steps and you’ll move from intuition to data-backed decisions.
Communication skills are no longer a “nice-to-have”—they’re a measurable predictor of performance, retention, and team velocity. The best assessment tools don’t just grade grammar or confidence; they capture how people write, speak, listen, and adapt, then translate that into actionable, defensible data.
The five tools above work because they match different real-world hiring and development moments:
The smartest approach is to work backward from where miscommunication costs you the most—missed deadlines, poor customer interactions, slow onboarding, compliance errors—and then choose the assessment built to catch that issue before it becomes expensive. When you pair the right tool with the right hiring stage, you’ll move from “gut feel” to a repeatable, fair, evidence-based evaluation process.
A CSA test is a structured evaluation that measures how effectively someone communicates in workplace scenarios. Depending on the tool, it can assess writing clarity, listening accuracy, speaking confidence, tone, professionalism, and interpersonal style.
No. They’re equally useful for:
Team-based tools like TeamDynamics are especially valuable for development rather than selection.
TeamDynamics. It’s designed for team-level insight (not individual grading), so it helps groups identify friction points and improve communication norms without putting employees on the defensive.
eSkill. It’s built for micro-skill measurement—grammar, spelling, reading comprehension, and timed writing—making it a strong fit for roles where written precision affects compliance, customer trust, or documentation quality.
HiPeople. It delivers quick results through scenario-based prompts and AI scoring, with a free plan that works well for startups and lean recruiting teams.
iMocha. It offers CEFR-aligned language testing plus support for 50+ languages and professional communication modules (email tone, persuasion, etiquette), making it suited for distributed, global teams.
TestGorilla. It’s designed for scale—auto-scoring, benchmarking, percentile rankings, and easy pairing with other skill tests—so recruiters can screen hundreds of candidates efficiently.
They can be, but it depends on your workflow and region. To reduce risk:
If your organization operates in jurisdictions with strict rules for automated hiring tools (like NYC), confirm the vendor supports compliance requirements.
No—communication tests work best as an input, not a replacement. The strongest process usually looks like:
Use this quick decision filter:
Then confirm: modalities tested, fairness controls, ATS/LMS integration, and pricing model.